Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Lot #192
Francis Scott Key and Roger B. Taney Document Signed

Scarce legal document signed by a future Chief Justice and his brother-in-law, the writer of the 'Star-Spangled Banner'

This lot has closed

Estimate: $400+
Sell a Similar Item?
Refer Collections and Get Paid
Share:  

Description

Scarce legal document signed by a future Chief Justice and his brother-in-law, the writer of the 'Star-Spangled Banner'

ADS in Taney's hand, signed "F. S. Key" and “R. B. Taney,” one page, 7.75 x 12.5, no date. Legal document in the case of John Marker vs. Margaret Keefer in which Taney, as attorney for the defense, seeks to dismiss the action brought against Marker in that "the matters therein contained are not sufficient in law...to have or maintain her said action against him. " Taney signs at the head and conclusion; Francis Scott Key—his brother-in-law and fellow attorney—also adds his endorsement at the conclusion. In very good to fine condition, with lightly trimmed edges and multiple intersecting folds.

Taney (1777-1864) served as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court from 1836 until his death, most notably presiding over the infamous Dred Scott decision. Before holding that office, Taney served as secretary of the treasury and attorney general. Key (1779-1843) was a Baltimore lawyer who was inspired to write the ‘Star-Spangled Banner’ after he witnessed the bombardment of Fort McHenry by the British in 1814.

Auction Info

  • Auction Title: Fine Autograph and Artifacts
  • Dates: #685 - Ended January 10, 2024





This item is Pre-Certified by PSA/DNA
Buy a third-party letter of authenticity for (inquire for price)

*This item has been pre-certified by a trusted third-party authentication service, and by placing a bid on this item, you agree to accept the opinion of this authentication service. If you wish to have an opinion rendered by a different authenticator of your choosing, you must do so prior to your placing of any bid. RR Auction is not responsible for differing opinions submitted 30 days after the date of the sale.