RR Auction Home
Current Auction Is Open For Bidding
Bidding Closes Wednesday March 10
Home |Sitemap|Contact Us| Past Auctions  
 How to Bid   Register to Bid   Auctions   Consign   About Us   Featured Lots 
If you don't have a Bidder Number, register now to bid!
back button 30 Minute Rule Begins on the Evening of March 10 at 7:00PM ET
An Initial Bid Must Be Placed By 6:00PM ET To Participate After 6:00PM ET NEXT LOT PREVIOUS LOT
Item   Title MB Now at Next bid Bids New bid Max bid  
170   Timothy Pickering Autograph Letter Signed  $200 $252 $278 2 You must login to place a bid.
click to enlarge
Mouse Over to Zoom/Click to Enlarge

#170 - Timothy Pickering Autograph Letter Signed Estimate: $3,000+

Pickering turns down a lobbyist and mentions Jefferson, Adams, Napoleon, and postage fees

ALS, four pages on two adjoining sheets, 8 x 9.75, September 1, 1824. Addressed from Salem, Massachusetts, a lengthy handwritten letter to James Causten, (1788-1874), a War of 1812 naval veteran and Baltimore merchant and attorney who lobbied Congress on behalf of merchants whose ships and cargo were seized by France during the Quasi-War of 1798-1800. In part: "I received on the 9th your letter of the 2d of August on the Subject of the claims of American merchants for French spoliations between and during the years 1793 & 1800, which were abandoned and renounced by our own government, in the treaty made with Bonaparte, when First Consul. You seem to wish and expect me to write an elaborate treatise, or dissertation on the subject, in order to establish the claims of the merchants, for indemnities, on our own government. Really, sir, I have not as you appear to suppose, the ambition to figure in that line. It is a subject for an able lawyer & civilian who will be paid for his labour. My opinion is sufficiently manifested in my ‘review,’ which you inform me you have read. But that will not have any weight with the National Legislature. And if, by an ample discussion, I could demonstrate the justice of the claims in question, I am far from thinking that provision would ever be made to discharge them. The magnitude of their amount, with other considerations, forbids the expectation of such provision being made by Congress for paying them out of the public treasury. I have an impression (but perhaps I mistake) that some merchants of Boston, soon after the treaty was ratified, petitioned Congress for the redress now sought by the merchants for whom you are acting, but that no countenance was shown them, to encourage a hope of success. If France had a territory, like the Floridas, within our reach; and if the French, like the Spaniards in the hour of their distress, could be coerced to part with it, there might be some hope. I have stated in my Review, that Spain, in the early part of Mr. Jefferson’s administration, agreed to indemnify the American merchants for illegal captures and condemnations by Spanish armed vessels & Spanish tribunals; but that our own government refused, at the only proper times, to ratify the treaty; because Spain refused to be accountable for French injuries committed; in her jurisdiction which she was under duress from the power of France & suffered (as she was utterly unable to prevent it) French armed vessels to capture and bring into her ports, and French Consuls to erect themselves into admiralty courts to condemn American vessels so captured & brought in. For these latter spoliations, the demands of our government on Spain was palpably unjust and under other circumstances, would never have been submitted to by her government. I consider Spain as having been bullied into the cession of Florida, -- so far as it related to those atrocious French spoliations.

In the printed copy which you inclosed of the memorial and petition of the merchants to Congress, for indemnities, they say that they were among the first to sanction the act of our government, by which their claims on France for compensation were renounced; and consider that renunciation ‘a strong evidence of its profound wisdom.’ Those gentlemen are now blest with its fruits. I have manifested a very different opinion. I presume that my Review exhibits satisfactory proofs, that is was the intrigue of democracy operating on the inordinate ambition of President Adams, which originated the mission to France in 1799, and caused the nomination of Mr. Murray; and, as that would not take with the Senate, the subsequent nomination of Ellsworth, Davy & Murray, to negotiate a peace & treaty with France. The mischievous effects and consequences of the entire transaction, in regard to the honor and high interests of the United States, are set forth in my Review. The vast losses thence accruing to the American merchants, are those for which they are now seeking redress. If that largest portion of the community which approved of the mission, with their leaders who contrived it, could be compelled to furnish the indemnities in question, it would seem to be just; while those who detested the measure in its origin, and would, if possible, have prevented its execution, ought not, in equity, now to be saddled with the burthen of taxes, to the amount of twenty millions of dollars, to indemnify the sufferers. I know that such a distinction is impossible, in the practical administration of government; but if the numerous merchants who were opposed to the mission, were not also very great and probably the greatest sufferers, the entire failure of success, in the applications to Congress for redress, would not excite any deep commiseration. The enthusiastic admirers of imperial as well as of republican France, might be allowed to enjoy, unenvied, the fruits of their devotion. Sir, you may be well known to others, and entitled to much respect; but to me you are an absolute stranger. I never, before the receipt of your letter, saw, or heard of your name. I stand not on ceremony and desire no special deference; but being such a stranger should you not have obtained an introduction from some gentleman in your city whom I know, & have paid the postage of the packet? While I am, as I always have been, willing to render any reasonable services to my fellow citizens, it is unreasonable that my purse as well as my time should be taxed in rendering them. To these postage taxes, indeed, owing to the avarice or heedlessness of letter writers, I have long been subjected. You inform me that you are the agent of many mercantile suffering claimants; & doubtless you are receiving a full compensation for your agency. Be this as it may, I cannot but consider the tax of fifty cents only, for your letter and its inclosure, for an object in which I have not the shadow of personal interest, as an imposition." In fine condition, with light staining along the left edge. Accompanied by the original unfolded and hand-addressed mailing envelope.

In 1823, John Adams’ private letters to his cousin, William Cunningham, Jr., a journalist and lawyer, filled with Adams’ unguarded, critical remarks about Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), who considered Adams a friend, and Alexander Hamilton, by then deceased, were published in an effort to damage the presidential aspirations of John Quincy Adams; Cunningham’s son, was a supporter of Adams’ challenger Andrew Jackson, and published the letters shortly after his father’s suicide. The contents of the letters prompted Pickering to publish A Review of the Correspondence between the Honorable John Adams, Late President of the United States, and the Late William Cunningham in 1824.

In our letter, Pickering discusses French control of Spain and, by extension, Spanish Florida, which Jefferson secretly tried to annex in 1805-1806 by asserting pressure on France. Florida did become part of the United States in 1819 with the Adams-Onis Treaty that ceded the territory to the U.S. in exchange for $5 million in claims against the Spanish government dating back to the Quasi-War. Our letter records Pickering’s lingering disagreement with the international policy of John Adams as well as Causten’s ongoing pursuit of French spoliation claims.

This item is Pre-Certified!
Purchase a third-party full letter of authenticity for $35.
No extra postage and no long delays!
Click here if you are interested.


back button
Help links  
Learn more about our autograph authentication experts...
click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge
Buyer's Premium   The Bidder acknowledges and agrees that a 25.0% buyer’s premium will be added to the hammer price on all individual Timed Auction lots. For additional information view our complete terms and conditions.
Your bid is a contract  Placing a bid online means you agree to abide by the terms and conditions listed by RRAuction.
Payment methods accepted   All checks, cashiers checks, bank checks, or money orders are payable to R&R Auction Company of Massachusetts, LLC. RR Auction clients with an invoice $1000 or under will have the option to pay by credit card or Paypal. Please send Paypal payments to FinanceDepartment@rrauction.com.
Payment for items won in auction 604 is due by Monday, March 22nd unless prior arrangements have been made. Late payment may result in suspension of your bidding privileges.
Condition An item’s general condition is rated on an ascending scale of 1 to 4: good, very good, fine, very fine. Additional specific details that would not be obvious from the illustration, if any, are mentioned in the description.
Further descriptions You can call us or email us if you'd like us to answer questions about these items.